Poetic Tips IV (supposing intensifies)


One relatively important thing I’ve taken notice lately by glancing at academic standpoints to grand compositions is symbology by association and how that impacts the _weight_ of a present verse or structure. The greatest example might be any poem written by T.S. Eliot (most notably, The Waste Land), which packs a myriad of literary and symbolic references in a singular modernistic composition almost subdivided by those very same symbols. (II: A Game of Chess contains references to the Prothalamion, Verlaine, Sappho, St. Augustine, and many more. Although this part of the composition is considerable in length, one can still assume the level of referential usage is greater than the one of the specific narrative.)
So, the question lays still: how are these references important to the spine of the poem, and not only Waste Land, any poem that references anything?

One general device of “writing the best words in the best order” (a quote by Samuel Taylor Coleridge believed to be said in 1827, when asked about poetry),
is the usage of symbols to convey a wider sense of emotion. As magical as poetry can be, it can also be very restrictive, you must be economical in every verse and stanza, siphoning from inner images in order to convey as much as possible with as little words as possible. Importing symbols from previous works of literary culture allows for a greater condensation of the message, through the somatic marker present in those works (of course, it relies on the knowledge from the reader’s side to actually know the referencing, otherwise it loses all leverage and becomes rather the opposite: a confusing word-salad).

Exemplifying, if I wanted to relay the toxic nature of hope without going through the hassle of creating a full stanzaic foundation for it, because that toxic interaction is only background to the skeletal basis of the poem, I can import from a generally known and easy-to-understand mythological fable (as many have before me, mythology is great for this exercise)

‘All evils dare not compare to Pandora’s youthful hope’

Merely an example, Pandora’s Box fable ends with the opening of the box and subsequent discovery of hope being the last of evils locked within it, also the only one that didn’t flee. The symbolical magnitude of this fable is great, and great will also be the impact it has on your poems message, if used correctly.

“But Johnny, you cursed fool, I haven’t seen many of these on your poems!” says Lucian the Annoyed, with a monstrous expression in stand-by to ambush.

I actually make a slightly ridiculous amount of references in my poetry, but I avoid the usage of names as I don’t find their sonority very helpful to the flow. Some names work, others do not, but I generally avoid them all, and prefer subtle references to film or music in place of literary symbolism. It is, however, nowhere as ridiculous as Ezra Pound or T.S. Eliot, they took it a bit too far, in my humble opinion (I’m not a fan of either, I do not enjoy poems that overly rely on symbolic imports because I prefer poetry to homework), although T.S. Eliot’s Love Song is still one of my favourite compositions of any author, which proves that the level of connectivity between a symbolical poem and it’s reader is how much it relates to that readers elected literary sphere.

TL;DR, use references and challenge yourself to stretch them and paint them some beauty as you do it, but also allow them to be accessible and thematically fluid with the poem, not only cosmetically. Also, do not sacrifice the spine of your poem by jamming in a fun-summon, all pieces must still fit, as I said on Poetic Tips I and II.

And in that note, I too should take my tips, since I recurrently make all the mistakes displayed above.


Published by


A tick clinging to the bristles of a purple boar.

5 thoughts on “Poetic Tips IV (supposing intensifies)”

  1. This was a great read! Symbolism is definitely harder for me, as I am a novice at writing poems. What do you think about more ‘simplistic’ poems e.g. focusing on one moment or using more simple language without many references and symbols?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. No way of writing poetry is an inherently bad way, there are more important factors, the usage of symbolism is merely background to the weight of our compositions.
      Literal poetry can be augmented with the usage of literary devices or an extreme amount of parataxis (A Rock is Just a Rock, by Alberto Caeiro, is a great example of modern parataxis usage, although not taking form of a poem in most translations, it does so in Portuguese).
      Regardless of your level, just be genuine, and it can’t go wrong. Many now considered brilliant poets used symbolism to a minimal, or not at all.
      Thank you for the feedback 🙂

      Liked by 2 people

  2. Thank you so much for this great poetic enlightenment. I agree with you that succintness is one of the most important things in poetry. That is perhaps why I like reading poetry that much. Your poems, BTW, whether in Portuguese or English, are absolutely beautiful. You have a way with words. Also, I think succintness plus symbolic imports are key to poetic expression, so I agree with this: “Importing symbols from previous works of literary culture allows for a greater condensation of the message, through the somatic marker present in those works…” However, as you say, if those symbols are not shared you get the reader’s incomprehension. I love T.S.Eliot: The Waste Land, Burnt Norton, The Hollow Men, Ash-Wednesday, Ariel Poems, the Marina poem… I think he was genius, yet he had Ezra Pound’s help. I simply delight in the sound of words and I admit I had to look for the symbolic references especially those related to the Bible and to Greek mythology. But, well, this also happens to me with Shakespeare and Dante (loved Divine Comedy). Anyway, this is a great post!

    Liked by 1 person

    1. First of all, thank you so much!
      I love Eliot too, The Hollow Men is also a poem I hold very dear. He was absolutely a genius, I will never dare say he wasn’t, but at times I feel a bit disconnected from his works that over-rely on symbols and referencing, but that’s mostly my problem haha.
      Shakespeare used referencing very well, and Dante is one of my absolute untouchables, the way he not only references but gives higher elevation to the works he displays (like his vision of Virgil) is just jaw-breaking.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.